SWOT analysis

Strengths

User-owned cooperative model — gives users governance and influence over development, which can build loyalty and alignment with user needs.
Open-source software — enables transparency, community contributions, and the ability for users to modify or fork the code.
EU-based with privacy focus — positions the project to appeal to organisations concerned about data protection and local economic support.
Clear, phased roadmap — from smart sketching and floorplans to 3D conversion, Blender integration, and a full BIM.
Emphasis on UX and interoperability — high-quality output and seamless workflow integration, attractive to professional users.
Blender integration for high-quality visualisation — leverages an established, powerful open tool for rendering/visualisation.

Very early-stage / pre-product risk — limited current product maturity and resources, no products yet.
Dependence on community/partner funding and contributions — cooperative and open-source funding models can be slower to secure stable financing and development capacity. It’s unlikely I can find any single partner to just send over a few millions to get started.

Market for privacy-forward, EU-based alternatives — can attract public-sector clients and firms prioritising data sovereignty and GDPR alignment.
Demand for interoperable, user-friendly CAD/BIM tools — opportunity to win users dissatisfied with complex, proprietary incumbents by offering better UX and workflow integration, especially in the light of the nordic letter and other public petitions.
Leverage open-source and Blender ecosystems — community contributions, third‑party extensions, and integrations can accelerate development and adoption.
Partnerships and co-founding collaborators — current call for initial partners creates an opening to form strong strategic alliances with firms, universities, or studios.

Strong incumbents and network effects in CAD/BIM — established vendors and file-format ecosystems make market entry and switching difficult.
Compatibility and standards barriers — ensuring smooth interoperability with existing industry formats and workflows is technically and commercially challenging.
Funding and sustainability risk — as an early cooperative project relying on partners and community support, there is a threat of slow funding or resource gaps that delay roadmap delivery.
Potential fragmentation from forks — while forking is a strength, it can also split contributor effort and confuse customers if governance and direction aren’t clear.